<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going On and On About Run-Ons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wardofwords.com/2008/06/going-on-and-on-about-run-ons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wardofwords.com/2008/06/going-on-and-on-about-run-ons/</link>
	<description>The Grammar Guardian</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cyril</title>
		<link>http://www.wardofwords.com/2008/06/going-on-and-on-about-run-ons/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>cyril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wardofwords.com/?p=22#comment-2</guid>
		<description>great tips! very much useful.

I agree, run-on sentences at most times, does take out the meaning of the message or worse, it may even imply a different message as was originally intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great tips! very much useful.</p>
<p>I agree, run-on sentences at most times, does take out the meaning of the message or worse, it may even imply a different message as was originally intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
